amd epyc 7302 benchmark

0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm . Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core . Forged from the finest silicon. It is the most expensive non-custom AMD CPU ever. 2?I know this isn't optimal, nor recommended, but performance wise the AM4 drivers are better.The TR is my private PC at home.

The 64 core 7702P was, unsurprisingly the top performer with SQL aggregate scores of 12,634 TPS and an average latency of 5ms and Sysbench saw the CPU with an … The benchmark makes me want an TR3000 with 16 or 24c and a boost aid 4ghz, that will be Epyc Since I got the server up and running I thought I post some 1st benches for anyone interested.I haven't done so many tests. The 7402P had an aggregate score of 5.25ms with VMs ranging from 3ms to 6ms.

Core count and clock speed are the main differentiators here. 8 octets 16 nibbles . The 7302P has 16 cores, 32 threads, and a base frequency of 3GHz. Scroll down for comparison chart. As we continue our testing across the new EPYC platforms that come out and expand the scope of applications, it will be interesting to see how well these stack up against traditional Intel dual socket configurations.

And no I don't have Linux installed.I have a question, what do you see for clock speeds during your loads? The 16 core 7302P had SQL scores of 9,397.6 TPS, with an average latency of 1,712ms; for Sysbench the CPU saw 2,261.3 TPS, an average latency of 113.3ms, and a 99th percentile latency of 231.2ms.For Sysbench we tested 8VMs and saw aggregate scores of 15,914 TPS for the 7702P, 3,369.3 TPS for the 7402P, and 2,261.3 TPS for the 7302P.This test uses SQL Server 2014 running on Windows Server 2012 R2 guest VMs, and is stressed by Quest Software’s Benchmark Factory for Databases. Technology: CMOS Clock: 2,000 MHz-2,400 MHz Package: FCLGA-4094 Socket: Socket … AMD Epyc 7302P vs Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3: 8. 38825. Process: 14 nm. AMD Ryzen 7 3700U vs AMD Epyc 7302P: 11. I guess the Epyc is a lot faster in 1080p in relation to the UHD because the AVX512 instruction can be put to better use here.Where did you buy a Supermicro H11 rev. GPU and CPU Benchmarks for Monero Mining.
While our traditional usage of this benchmark has been to test large 3,000-scale databases on local or shared storage, in this iteration we focus on spreading out four 1,500-scale databases evenly across our servers.Adam is the chief news editor for StorageReview.com, managing our internal and freelance content teams.Each Sysbench VM is configured with three vDisks: one for boot (~92GB), one with the pre-built database (~447GB), and the third for the database under test (270GB). If you are able to find a bare H11 v2 board its because the seller sold the CPU separately. The 7402P had near identical aggregate TPS of 12,634.6 with individual VMs ranging from 3,157.9 TPS to 3,159.8 TPS.

Brand: AMD.

With double the core density and optimizations that improve instructions per cycle, the result is 4x the Floating-Point performance 3 of 1 st Gen AMD EPYC™.. 7nm process technology also brings energy efficiency. A subreddit dedicated to Advanced Micro Devices and its products. The 7402P had SQL scores of 12,634 TPS and an average latency of 5.25ms and Sysbench gave the processor scores of 3,369.3 TPS, 76ms average latency, and a 99th percentile latency of 159.6ms.

We used 4VMs and 4 NVMe drives for SQL Server and 8VMs and 8 NVMe drives for Sysbench. I'll report backI was waiiti3for that comment TR2950x with PBO on 360 water: 5:07mLatency: Epyc Octal DDR4-2933R 23-21-21-47 CR1 121.1 nsThe Epyc is in a 19" chassis for work and will run 2 VMs, maybe 3, 2 Databases and a file storage raid with 28GB RAID on sata enterprise SSDs.

Perhaps more impactful though will be the ability to use single processor systems effectively in software defined use cases, like VMware vSAN, where licensing is tied to CPU sockets. AMD Epyc 7302 - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark and Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark results

All rights reserved.To look a little deeper into the CPUs, The AMD EPYC 7702P has 64 cores and 128 threads as well as base GHz of 2.0.

Instead we tested the different CPUs for readers to get an idea what to expect, so they can better choose the processor that is right for their use case.For performance we tested the AMD EPYC 7702P, the AMD EPYC 7402P, and the AMD 7302P in both SQL Server and Sysbench. AMD Epyc 7302P vs Intel Core i7-6500U: 10. Socket : SP3.
Updated: June 2020.