Radeon Pro WX 4100 benchmark

A PCIe x8 format would give better deployment flexibility.

We expect to see this trend throughout our benchmarks.

@Jason H Goodliffe for plex specifically you’ll want an nvidia card as opposed to a radeon thanks to nvenc.

The WX 7100, for example, is similar in design to the RX 480, but it has one cool trick under its sleeves: it’s single-slot.All tests are run at least twice to produce an accurate result, and if for some reason an odd result creeps up, we do a third run.

Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Baffin graphics processor, in its Baffin XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12. Weniger ist besser. Aside from the small form factor and low power use the AMD Radeon PRO WX 4100 includes 4x Mini-Display Ports for video outputs which can handle multiple 4K displays for applications like digital signage.One area we feel that AMD could have made another design choice on is the PCIe configuration.
The P620 is a pascal based card at the same pricepoint of the WX4100 but if you want room for more than 2 transcodes(the p620 only supports 2 concurrent sessions) you’ll want to look up the stack at the p2000 which can be found for ~400 and supports “unlimited” concurrent sessions(there is a limit in reality but I’ve heard of people passing 9 encodes on one card so I don’t know what the practical limit on a p2000 is)Next, let us take a look at the AMD Radeon PRO WX 4100 key specifications and continue on with our performance testing.Good you review these low power cards too! It is a trade-off that AMD made with this card.The AMD Radeon PRO WX 4100 measures in at 6.6” long and does not use additional power connectors. Doing so made our graphs much easier to read, many users here at STH do not run cards in those configurations or simply cannot do so in Linux based systems so this was warranted. For our first in-depth look, we’re taking the sub-$500 WX 5100 and WX 4100 models for a spin in the workstation market.The WX 7100 is the big gun, the one designed for all sorts of rendering, including VR. The full dataset analysis is done on a heavy cluster, but for proof of concept work these cards are a gem! AMD Radeon PRO WX4100 Geekbench.

The “Enterprise” version is the hardened version, designed for those who don’t plan to upgrade more than once per three months, and aim to make their environment as stable as possible.

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU und AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher.

While the other driver, “Crimson ReLive”, is undoubtedly stable, it’s not likely to meet most corporate guidelines for production drivers.That said, if gaming is an important feature of your workstation card, you’ll definitely want to opt for the WX 7100 for the best overall performance.

Also, our benchmarks are run on a 4K display which the AMD Radeon PRO WX 4100 can handle for general purpose work, lower screen resolutions might be better for more demanding workloads.This is probably not the card you want to deploy, even in quantity, for brute force crypto work.Get the best of STH delivered weekly to your inbox. We normally focus on the higher-performance parts, but we also wanted to cover these entry-level designs for our readers to get a sense of what they are buying. The Bamboo benchmark takes over 3x the time of the next slowest card in our data set.Uses cases for the AMD Radeon PRO WX 4100 would not be for high-end graphics, heavy compute tasks or major CAD/Render work, we do not expect to see benchmark results above the bottom of our charts, but the AMD Radeon PRO WX 4100 handles light-duty tasks fine.